Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 20:02:00 -0500 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ok, who broke timed? Message-ID: <20011119200200.A33416@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011119165129.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800 References: <20011120003613.GA29465@student.uu.se> <XFMail.011119165129.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has fixed
> this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bit of
> a pain. :( Perhaps it should use uint32_t? Or perhaps struct tsp should use
> its own variant of timeval with uint32_t or some such. Ugh.
If timeval is different sizes on different archs then I would
recomend the work be done take it to 64 bits, not 32. It fixes a
problem in about 30 years. :-)
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011119200200.A33416>