Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 23:43:22 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Simon Shapiro <shimon@simon-shapiro.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: YADR (yet another DEVFS Release) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980106234026.2456G-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.980106233313.shimon@simon-shapiro.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a slice11 in the works. but I'm working on a strange problem with mounting floppies (it crashes). What is the setup of slices in your machine? (dmesg output would be the most succinct). and which slices fail fsck? On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Simon Shapiro wrote: > Howdee! > > Slice10 looks real good. > > The only problem I have so far, is on the new sendero; > > fsck -p complains that certain partitions are busy. This I belive to be > incorrect. There is nothing wrong that is detectable, but the same three > partitions are always busy for fsck -p but will mount -a (or fsck) > perfectly fine from the shell. > > I also compiled a SLICEed SMP kernel and that looks correct too. Managed > to NFS mount all of Nomis on Sendero and cpio the entire machine over > without a hitch. > > Here is the configuration, in case you cared: > > MB: P6DNH2 with 2xP6-200 > RAM: 384MB > Video: Matrox MGA 2064W graphics accelerator > SCSI: DPT PM3334UW w/64MB RAM > DPT PM3334UDW w/64MB RAM > > Disks: Iomega Jaz (for testing) - Still have to play with remove-insert > RAID-1 for boot device - 4GB usable - Single bus > RAID-5 for storage - 28GB usable - Single bus shared with RAID-1 > RAID-0 for playing around - 28GB split across 2 busses > > There are two DAT drives on the system, one on each bus, as well as a > Yamaha WORM. They all are doing fine. > > I will be adding another RAID-5 array tomorrow and hook up another CPU to > the same pair of busses; For multi initiator and DLM development. > > I have tested the large arrays as both a single 28GB slice/partition and as > a split/fragmented. They both seem to be doing fine. > > The only problem appears to be with fsck. Given the standard /etc/rc > script it fails miderably with large partitions and/or many filesystems. > It needs the enclosed patch to work. > > If fsck cannot be fixed to acomodate such a large collection of large > disks, I'll be happy to submit a patch the /etc/rc that works. It is a bit > slower than the current one but works. > > Thanx for the help and the functionality. > > Simon > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980106234026.2456G-100000>