Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 14:17:52 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The future of ZFS in FreeBSD Message-ID: <CANCZdfpVZO=8Q9Y%2BBkBB14V48fVJY9H_0-onHrCcyY0hgWUw9g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ad11e5e3-5a2c-1fb5-49ff-d7ee491a1ebb@freebsd.org> References: <CAPrugNriggEMMnLTZtf6xNQNYajBYNMnGdN96-ejDYQonoOhgw@mail.gmail.com> <20181219163033.jwm7opiwmdhbk6p3@mutt-hbsd> <a64a41fd-f287-cf9d-cd4c-9e55c21c2f00@freebsd.org> <ad11e5e3-5a2c-1fb5-49ff-d7ee491a1ebb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:49 PM Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> wrote: > I am to give a big thanks to Matt Ahrens for organizing the monthly > OpenZFS Leadership meeting, and the OpenZFS developer summit, and to > Brian Behlendorf for being so helpful, and willing to work to make > OpenZFS better for everyone. > I'd recommend the monthly leadership meetings. They dispelled any doubt that I had that there were overly powerful factions present that would disadvantage FreeBSD. The calls were worthwhile to understand the context of a number of other things being discussed. It seems much healthier in this context than things I've seen in the Illumos context because of a lack of burdensome process that provided no benefit and actually got in the way (which honestly, was my expectations going into the meeting). There's good reason to trust OpenZFS, it's leadership and decision making process. If ZoL is the best upstream source, then I trust their judgement on that, regardless of the hassles it will cause us in the coming months. >From the discussions I've seen, there is no pain-free choice that doesn't relegate FreeBSD to a backwater of what we have today. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpVZO=8Q9Y%2BBkBB14V48fVJY9H_0-onHrCcyY0hgWUw9g>