Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:30:52 +0000 From: "Joseph Koshy" <joseph.koshy@gmail.com> To: "Ryan Stone" <rysto32@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled? Message-ID: <84dead720810071030w4b8f50d7q2068ee53f07990e9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <bc2d970810070831nb19a8f7ibfd7878bf6b2e4aa@mail.gmail.com> References: <bc2d970810061328p794782aaxed78dc1a32077ec6@mail.gmail.com> <84dead720810062102r2baf0e32y10594d3f1d07120d@mail.gmail.com> <bc2d970810070831nb19a8f7ibfd7878bf6b2e4aa@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is it intentional that pmcstat -c '*' <whatever> does not use the > haltedcpus mask while pmcstat <whatever> will? No, its just the way the code evolved. Fixed in SVN #183672. Koshy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84dead720810071030w4b8f50d7q2068ee53f07990e9>