Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:37:10 -0700 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@iitbombay.org> To: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org Cc: "go@freebsd.org" <go@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [Bug 285963] lang/go* fail to build on the amd64 package builders Message-ID: <B2DCC160-B8F3-445F-9751-813C7A960BBE@iitbombay.org> In-Reply-To: <bug-285963-42334-B6sWDRXBet@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-285963-42334@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> <bug-285963-42334-B6sWDRXBet@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Apr 16, 2025, at 6:12 PM, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > 1. Patch cmd/go to run brandelf itself after it renames a.out to the > destination binary (the last step of the compilation chain). > 2. Start discussing whether la57 was premature and needs to be rolled > back temporarily. From https://github.com/golang/go/issues/49405#issuecomment-2802384059 > Linux is much better about never breaking existing binaries, so any la57 > support would require explicit opt-in by the binary. This to me seems to be the best option. How many binaries would really *require* 5 level page tables? opt-in seems better than opt-out! FreeBSD used to be much better at maintaining backward compatibility....home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B2DCC160-B8F3-445F-9751-813C7A960BBE>