Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 12:28:48 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 286599] ps(1) with -J <jail> broken sometime between b095a41a3a2a & 4fa275a5f357 Message-ID: <bug-286599-227-tek4ENj9P7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-286599-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286599 Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |olce@FreeBSD.org CC| |olce@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Closed --- Comment #1 from Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> --- Hey Dave, There is indeed an on-purpose change in behavior, both to become standard compliant and also for consistency. See commit message of https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=93a94ce731a89b and also the updated manual page. In a nutshell, once a process is selected by any option, it will be listed regardless of the other options (except for -X/-x, which work as a (non-)filter; in more formal words, the processes selected by each option form a set, and all these sets are unioned/ORed to obtain the final process list). If you want to list processes only from a specific jail, then you simply don't need '-a'. Just remove it from your command-line and you should get the expected result. '-J' is not a filter (and AFAICT nothing hints it was intended to be one, both in the code and the documentation). Thanks and regards. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-286599-227-tek4ENj9P7>