Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:27:52 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Strange network/socket anomalies since about a month Message-ID: <868r127js7.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <d915e7b730f59a531d03b027215f81e0@Leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:01:26 %2B0200") References: <1fe609f252e7fae6d746530d5035ec0e@Leidinger.net> <ZiaMgRH-8vecPfSt@cell.glebi.us> <d915e7b730f59a531d03b027215f81e0@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes: > Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> writes: > > I don't have any better idea than ktrace over failing application. > > Yep, I understand that poudriere will produce a lot. > Yes, it does. 4.4 GB just for the start of poudriere until the first > package build fails due to a failed sccache start [...] Using `ktrace -tcnpstuy` instead of just `ktrace` should greatly reduce the size of the trace file. (remind me to modify ktrace and kdump so this can be written as `-t-i` or `-tI` instead...) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868r127js7.fsf>