Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:04:01 +0200 From: Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gjournal and Softupdates Message-ID: <ygfirjto0z2.fsf@dominion.borderworlds.dk> In-Reply-To: <ee5vat$fcb$1@sea.gmane.org> (Ivan Voras's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:40:31 %2B0200") References: <45066E19.2040405@kuehlbox.de> <ee5vat$fcb$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> writes: > - todays desktop drives can lie about writing data. SoftUpdates relies > on some assumptions about when the data is physically written to > media, and those are not always valid today I think journaling relies on the same assumptions. However, with journaling you can have filesystem corruption and not know about it. With fsck, bg or not, at least you will know. -- Christian Laursen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygfirjto0z2.fsf>