Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:45:32 -0800 From: Mark Atkinson <atkin901@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0RC2 amd64 - kernel panic running make buildworld Message-ID: <hcsslt$3ie$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <hcss08$p3$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20091031231545.493cee89@boiler.free.de> <867hu6gvou.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20091104163621.36943807@orwell.free.de> <hcss08$p3$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Atkinson wrote: > Kai Gallasch wrote: >> Am Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:24:01 +0100 >> schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>: >> >>> Kai Gallasch <gallasch@free.de> writes: >>>> I installed 8.0RC2-amd64 on an 8-core opteron server a few days ago. >>>> >>>> When I try to do a make buildworld or make buildkernel the server >>>> reboots without any message left in the logs. The same happens >>>> when building bigger ports (for example ruby18 or perl58) >>> Could it be related to this? What's your CPUID? > >> Found this in dmesg. Is this the CPUID? "Id = 0x100f23" > > That's generation 16 (0xf) model 2, stepping 3. This errata apparently > only effects gen 15 (0xe) and some pre-release -- never released to > public (0xf). I have the same processor in my system btw. sorry for the double wrong posting. I see several webpages refer to 15 as f and 16 as f. usr/ports/misc/cpuid refers to it as 15. The pages referenced via the bugzilla entry in the commit refer to it as 0xf but between 32 and 63. Does the model 2 correctly put us in the range in the commit 0x20 and 0x3f? (i.e. stepping is included?)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hcsslt$3ie$1>