Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:05:57 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AT&T substitute available on freebsd? Message-ID: <20100201160557.GB50360@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <hk6tcc$iqk$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <13dae8e51002010637v64462d66o275063cafca3d886@mail.gmail.com> <hk6tcc$iqk$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Feb 01), Ivan Voras said: > On 02/01/10 15:37, Jian Jun Wang wrote: > > I am not quite technical on this, y'know, in windows, we have AT&T > > software to access company intranet, not sure whether we have substitute > > here? I tried to figure out the ways to do that, no luck. I know on > > linux distribution they have agnclient. any ideas? > > You can expect a reliable answer only if someone has figured out what > protocol does your software use and has found some alternative. > > Offhand, since > http://info.attbusiness.net/agnclient/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.features > mentions "ipsec", I'd guess IPSec support might be your answer > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html). Also, looking at the posts on the Linux client support forum, AT&T is just barely supporting the Linux client as it is (SSL VPN only, no IPSEC support planned, only three OS versions supported). You will probably be better off running a small Windows XP vm inside VirtualBox and using the Windows client from that. http://www.attnetclient.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=894#p3036 http://www.attnetclient.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=951#p3239 -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100201160557.GB50360>