Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:13:09 +0300
From:      "UNIX developer @ Google.com" <developerunix@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Problem with routing in VmWare VMS
Message-ID:  <1988813484.20120622161309@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.wf9wkzvm34t2sn@tech304>
References:  <1842148286.20120621235936@gmail.com> <op.wf9wkzvm34t2sn@tech304>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Ok, I understud!
I remove from rc.conf this rows:
static_routes="clnet"
route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"

new rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
gateway_enable="YES"


now after reboot the problem still the same.

 ping -S 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) from 192.168.2.1: 56 data bytes
^C
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss


netstat -nr
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
default            192.168.1.1        UGS         0       38    em0
127.0.0.1          link#4             UH          0        0    lo0
192.168.1.0/24     link#1             U           0     1153    em0
192.168.1.10       link#1             UHS         0        6    lo0
192.168.2.0/24     link#2             U           0        0    em1
192.168.2.1        link#2             UHS         0        6    lo0

Where more can be trouble?


-------------
Вы писали 22 июня 2012 г., 0:56:49:

> On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:59:36 -0500, UNIX developer @ Google.com  
> <developerunix@gmail.com> wrote:

>> /etc/rc.conf
>> ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>> ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
>> gateway_enable="YES"
>> static_routes="clnet"
>> route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"

> You simply CANNOT do this. Traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 is bound to em1 and
> cannot be changed. You setup a static route that basically says "to find
> 192.168.2.0/24, don't use em1 but instead ask 192.168.1.10 how to find it"?

> This makes no sense at all.


-- 
С уважением,
 UNIX                          mailto:developerunix@gmail.com




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1988813484.20120622161309>