Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:03:28 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> To: "Vadim Goncharov" <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELEASE discs & ISO images (for future) Message-ID: <200803071803.m27I3SsA009434@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <opt7m6malv17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net> References: <slrnft21b5.2cho.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <200803071010.m27AAKZ6000482@fire.js.berklix.net> <opt7m6malv17d6mn@nuclight.avtf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Vadim Goncharov" wrote: > 07.03.08 @ 16:10 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > This sybject has nothing to do with stable@. > > It has because 6.3-RELEASE is also affected with docs issue, and future > releases 6.4 and 7.1 will be in both branches, as ell as 8.0. > > >> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > Posting to 2 FreeBSD lists is deprecated. > > hackers@ is for releases. > > Why? Looks like not the place for official staff. > > -- > WBR, Vadim Goncharov Please do Not break FreeSBD rules. Ref." http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL C.1.3 List Charters "No posting should be made to more than 2 mailing lists, and only to 2 when a clear and obvious need to post to both lists exists. For most lists, there is already a great deal of subscriber overlap and except for the most esoteric mixes (say -stable & -scsi), there really is no reason to post to more than one list at a time. If a message is sent to you in such a way that multiple mailing lists appear on the Cc line then the Cc line should also be trimmed before sending it out again. You are still responsible for your own cross-postings, no matter who the originator might have been." Julian -- Julian Stacey: BSDUnixLinux C Prog Admin SysEng Consult Munich www.berklix.com Mail just Ascii plain text. HTML & Base64 is spam.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200803071803.m27I3SsA009434>