Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:51:01 +0200 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: overclocking and freebsd Message-ID: <20020422055100.GA4956@lpt.ens.fr> In-Reply-To: <p05111708b8e8ed27ed64@[10.0.1.38]> References: <20020418110814.A64286@lpt.ens.fr> <20020418053829.X96787-100000@pogo.caustic.org> <20020419080009.L30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20020421214219.GA4662@lpt.ens.fr> <p05111708b8e8ed27ed64@[10.0.1.38]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles said on Apr 22, 2002 at 00:33:54: > At 11:42 PM +0200 2002/04/21, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > > > Ideally there would be another hotkey combination to cycle through > > windows related to the application. But cycling in a fixed sequence > > rather than using a "stack" -- *that* is a pain in the butt. > > So, <command>-<tab> would always pop the stack? And this > stack-popping is started all over again whenever any keyboard or > mouse events are passed through to the application below? Hmmm... > Interesting concept. But what happens if the mouse is accidentally > moved while popping the stack? I don't quite follow you. The stack is ordered in sequence of which window (or, in OS X, which application) had the last focus -- that is, every time you bring the focus to an application, you move it to the top of the stack. Doing alt-tab once will bring up the application which previously had the focus. Holding down alt, and pressing tab repeatedly, goes through the stack until you get the window you want. I don't see what the mouse has to do with it. Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020422055100.GA4956>