Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:09:50 +0200 From: xyz <harvey.two.face.kent@gmail.com> To: Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: Ivailo Tanusheff <i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighten kernel Message-ID: <4BD12B9E.4090606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <x2s3a142e751004221454we4df8223p8b8e97922c328a75@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BCEF432.7070707@gmail.com> <OF25D83A0C.BCA62A4C-ONC225770C.004928B3-C225770C.00494F93@procreditbank.bg> <4BCEFC8E.2070409@gmail.com> <t2q3a142e751004211202w8b8f1b01k5e014cac1cc7fae9@mail.gmail.com> <4BD0B51F.60308@gmail.com> <x2s3a142e751004221454we4df8223p8b8e97922c328a75@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Those numbers mean the size in mo, of linux kernel (3.2mo), and freebsd kernel (33,9mo) for the same hardware configuration. Is it difficult to update the patch? On 04/22/10 23:54, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 4/22/10, xyz<harvey.two.face.kent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> Thank you for your answer >> But "I can't believe" that lighten the kernel of useless drivers, saves >> only few bytes, by removing whole useless modules (sound, ata/sata, agp...). >> Furthermore, I think about free space that could be save too, in the >> hard drive this time. >> Why for the same configuration, linux kernel is lighter than the Freebsd >> kernel? (3.2mo ; 33.9mo) >> > Can you be more specific? What those numbers mean? > > >> And, can you release your patch please? >> > I can, but it may be out of sync. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BD12B9E.4090606>