Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:18:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tcp_wrappers: accumulated change-request PRs Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0406221713240.57669@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <yged63rlgh2.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org> References: <20040622153207.GB1961@empiric.dek.spc.org> <yged63rlgh2.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:32:07 +0100 > >>>>> Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> said: > > bms> Whilst scanning GNATS, I found a number of PRs relating to requests > bms> for tcp_wrappers functionality and some outright bugfixes. Rather than > bms> commit these as-is, I think we should push the changes back to Wietse, > bms> as we maintain tcp_wrappers on a vendor branch. > > bms> The PRs in question are: > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/31034 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32808 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/36556 > bms> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/42336 > > bms> What does everyone else think? > > Many part of our code is already off a vender branch since IPv6 > support, and it seems Wietse doesn't maintain tcp_wrappers actively. Post from Wietse (who is on Cc: as I see) about this from yesterday ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=postfix-users&m=108784059323250&w=2 /me remebers to have sent some patches to Wietse in 2002 that luckily didn't get comitted though CIDR notation is pretty nice ;-) -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0406221713240.57669>