Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:48:14 +0800 From: "David Xu" <bsddiy@163.net> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, "Alexander Langer" <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: "Robert Withrow" <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com>, "Jordan Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, <glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com> Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Message-ID: <002701c140a4$c5735a10$ef01a8c0@davidwnt> References: <XFMail.20010919094438.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I'm confused why Open and NetBSD both have XF4 installed, while we can't. why! David Xu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: "Alexander Langer" <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: "Robert Withrow" <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com>; "Robert Withrow" <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com>; "Jordan Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>; <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; <glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:14 AM Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 > > On 18-Sep-2001 Alexander Langer wrote: > > > The previous suggestion (have a generic XFree86 port) is a) hacky, but b) > > > workable in the current package framework I suspect.. > > > > Yes, would be a nice workaround. > > > > I don't use packages, though :) > > I'm forced not to if I'm using a machine which needs X4.. > > Usually for a fresh install I use packages since it gets a working machine > quicker :) > > --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002701c140a4$c5735a10$ef01a8c0>