Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:29:36 +1100 From: "Chris Martin" <outsidefactor@iinet.net.au> To: "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DAC 960 Tools Message-ID: <004801c40879$1f3fdac0$d915a8c0@tyr> References: <000301c4083a$32dc72d0$d915a8c0@tyr> <20040312140520.GC2790@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So I take it that the Kernel time fix was never committed? I am just wondering, as I was planning to give it another go and I won't bother even getting the ISO and installing if I am just setting myself up for more disappointment. cm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: "Chris Martin" <outsidefactor@iinet.net.au> Cc: <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 1:05 AM Subject: Re: DAC 960 Tools > On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:59:10AM +1100, Chris Martin wrote: > > ... > > > After that I whacked a Tru64 5.1 CD in the drive and booted fine and > > installed the OS. I now have a happy machine. Oh, why Tru64, you ask? Well, > > last time I installed FreeBSD time was an issue... That is all seemed fine, > > but the clock ran twice as fast. I hunted for a solution and then found that > > the Kernel code needed patching for a 2100, and never could get the kernel > > to compile after I hacked in the patch. Don't know if 5.2.1 has the same > > issue. Anyone know? > > Well, just that the guy who did the AS2100[a] support for FreeBSD does not > want to be reminded that he ever did :) These machines are quite weird > on the hardware side of things unfortunately. > > -- > Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?004801c40879$1f3fdac0$d915a8c0>