Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:22:20 +0200 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com> To: "Mike Meyer" <mwm-dated-1018274462.a4e94f@mired.org> Cc: <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Anti-Unix Site Runs Unix Message-ID: <005e01c1db44$e10d2a40$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <20020402113404.A52321@lpt.ens.fr><3CA9854E.A4D86CC4@mindspring.com><20020402123254.H49279@lpt.ens.fr><009301c1da83$9fa73170$0a00000a@atkielski.com><15530.6987.977637.574551@guru.mired.org><012601c1dadb$104d5100$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <15531.2846.277278.29276@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike writes: > Microsoft find a way around that. They offload > the tech support costs onto the supply chain. Not enough to make much of a difference. If I recall correctly, Microsoft has one of the largest technical-support organizations in the world. Practically everyone outside Redmond is either in sales or technical support. > They can therefore ship products with basically > unlimited numbers of bugs, and are more than > happy to do so. Which products has Microsoft shipped with "basically unlimited" numbers of bugs? > Since even Gates admitted that NT was a > crash-prone piece of junk ... When? I've found NT to be the most stable desktop operating system I've ever used. It's too early for me to assess XP. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005e01c1db44$e10d2a40$0a00000a>