Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:52:15 +0100 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> To: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com> Cc: "P. U. (Uli) Kruppa" <root@pukruppa.de>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: telnet to a Win2k-pro machine Message-ID: <04eb01c18054$217e7b70$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <20011208223542.U29324-100000@big> <04cb01c1804f$2673f5b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C12BCBB.80700@owt.com> <04e401c18050$314ea060$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3C12BEEC.6010402@owt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kent writes: > Well, NT-3.5x+ has had a POSIX subsystem and you > can run the POSIX commands from the telnet command > line. That's not NT administration, though. If you want something to run POSIX with telnet, why not just run UNIX? > For an editor, I use vi even on W2K. I use Notepad on Windows. For FreeBSD, currently I use joe most of the time. vi has a steep learning curve for the simple editing I usually have to do. > You can also setup your W2K machine to accept > lpr from a Unix system. I can't imagine adding > samba to a fine Unix machine just to share a printer. You could attach an A/B switch to the printer. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04eb01c18054$217e7b70$0a00000a>