Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:28:17 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: add LINUX_OSRELEASE to bsd.linux-rpm.mk Message-ID: <05084110@bs1.sp34.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080402080145.97672c008u0ewri8@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed\, 02 Apr 2008 08\:01\:45 %2B0200") References: <07011489@ipt.ru> <20080321115227.zkcrs6rvc4c8s004@webmail.leidinger.net> <98037310@ipt.ru> <20080322085434.10838040@deskjail> <62336383@ipt.ru> <62213004@bs1.sp34.ru> <20080402080145.97672c008u0ewri8@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:01:45 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:42:27 +0400): > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:36:00 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:54:34 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > >> > Where do we have to introduce the *_PORT > >> > stuff? Do we need a bsd.linux.mk, or can the bsd.linux-rpm.mk be used > >> > for this? The strict answer may be no, but do we want to be that strict? > > > >> Well, I'd prefer to use one existing file: bsd.linux-rpm.mk. If/when > >> we use some other distro (I have some positive results with ubuntu) > >> then may be we will have to use bsd.linux-deb.mk and split > >> bsd.linux-rpm.mk into two files. But so far it's OK to me to use > >> the existing one. > > > > Seems that I have change my mind since linux-rpm.mk is too tied to rpm > > format and dealing with it. The file can't be (easily) used with an > > average linux port. I tried to convert to using linux-rpm.mk acroread7 > > port. I got a mess. :-( > > > > Well, what about new bsd.linux-apps.rpm? > I think we should keep the .mk at the end. Sure, it was a typo. > What about > - bsd.port.mk which includes > - bsd.linux.mk which includes > - bsd.linux-rpm.mk (maybe conditionally) > - bsd.linux-XXX.mk (maybe conditionally) > LINUX_OSRELEASE can be put into bsd.linux.mk. The USE_LINUX stuff can > go into it too. Yep, fully agreed, this is our goal. But it will influence all linux ports at once. While I try to use an evolition way with minimal immediate impact to most linux ports. Almost as a Russian proverb says "Drive slower, get farther". ;-) WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05084110>