Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:29:21 -0500
From:      Brian T.Schellenberger <bts@babbleon.org>
To:        "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com>, "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: USB CF reader (SanDisk) epilog
Message-ID:  <05e5c4129170d12FE5@mail5.nc.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <00d201c19c0c$c513e300$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References:  <002301c19b4e$6ee9b950$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <0235a2158050d12FE5@mail5.nc.rr.com> <00d201c19c0c$c513e300$0a00000a@atkielski.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 13 January 2002 03:31 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Brian writes:
> > Surely if it fails under both FreeBSD
> > and Windows there's a very strong suggestion
> > that it's hardware problem, don't you think?
>
> No.  Two entirely different types of hardware.  The Windows machine has an
> internal PCMCIA reader.  The FreeBSD machine has an external USB CF reader.
> There is practically nothing common about the hardware across the two
> machines: they have different motherboards, processors, memory modules,
> disks, disk interfaces, monitors, video cards, and so on.  Therefore the
> old standby of "it must be hardware" won't work.
>
> > FWIW, the easiest way to get things off of
> > compactflash card is to use a PCMCIA adaptor.
>
> That's what I do on the Windows machine.  However, the software I used to
> use--a product that came from SystemSoft with the original internal PCMCIA
> drive--stopped working after I installed ADSL, because of an IRQ conflict,
> and I could not explicitly set IRQs for the SystemSoft module.  So I
> upgraded to a new version of the SystemSoft software that was supposed to
> allow this, and it did--but it started causing blue screens and stalling of
> the system regularly, so I had to abandon it.
>
> All I really want is to be able to read and write Compact Flash
> cards--only--with this little USB reader, and I'd like to be able to do
> that without stalling the system or corrupting the filesystems.  But it
> seems that even "reliable" FreeBSD cannot do that.


If anybody ever told you that FreeBSD was more reliable or better with 
"unusual" hardware we were sold a bill of goods.  The O/S is much more stable 
but hardware drivers consistently lag Windows.

But if you swapped O/S's it would work quite nicely: The FreeBSD support for 
PCMCIA/flash is very stable.  I use it all the time.  One suspects the 
Windows would work a lot better with the USB reader as well.  You just have 
the O/S's backwards :-(

(FreeBSD USB support is still a little dicey.)



-- 
Brian T. Schellenberger . . . . . . .   bts@wnt.sas.com (work)
Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . .   bts@babbleon.org (personal)
                                        http://www.babbleon.org

-------> Free Dmitry Sklyarov!  (let him go home)  <-----------

http://www.eff.org                 http://www.programming-freedom.org 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05e5c4129170d12FE5>