Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:10:18 +0100 From: Stas Verberkt <legolas@legolasweb.nl> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be =?UTF-8?Q?Updated=3F?= Message-ID: <05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f@homey.local> In-Reply-To: <loom.20121126T120530-186@post.gmane.org> References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <50B2AA07.8090103@tundraware.com> <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com> <50B2BEE1.9030903@tundraware.com> <loom.20121126T120530-186@post.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
jb schreef op : > Tim Daneliuk <tundra <at> tundraware.com> writes: > >> ... >> > I use portsnap fetch update and it works... >> >> Ah, maybe that was the problem. That works for me as well. > > Well, not quite ... > I think, after the security incident, you had to obtain a fresh snapshot of the ports tree, i.e. you had to do "portsnap fetch extract" before usual service continued. May this be your problem?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f>
