Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:43:49 -0000
From:      pf-r@solarflux.org
To:        pf4freebsd@freelists.org
Subject:   [pf4freebsd] Re: Version 1.60 (ALTQ & BLUE)
Message-ID:  <1060025504.3f2eb4a032ea3@mail.fluidhosting.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030804175623.GG31093@insomnia.benzedrine.cx>
References:  <000701c35a9a$9a8f4590$01000001@max900> <1060017371.3f2e94db7ef03@mail.fluidhosting.com> <20030804175623.GG31093@insomnia.benzedrine.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Run pfctl -vsq, it should print all the queues you have defined, and
> the counters pkts/bytes should increase when packets are assigned to
> queues (if they aren't, check pfctl -vsr to make sure your queue rules
> match). When pfctl -vsq shows dropped pkts/bytes, ALTQ is working and
> dropping packets. One relatively simple application is described on
> 
>   http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html
> 
> If you can reproduce the results of this test, at least priq is working,
> and you can then try other schedulers.

I'll do that, thanks.  I'm re-reading the PF: Queueing section of the FAQ, it's
answered some of the questions I mentioned before.

I really would like to use BLUE though, will that be supported soon in pf?

http://www.thefengs.com/wuchang/work/blue/CSE-TR-387-99.pdf










Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1060025504.3f2eb4a032ea3>