Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 11:59:55 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org> To: Pierre Beyssac <pb@fasterix.freenix.org> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <1089.895201195@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: pb's message of Fri, 15 May 1998 00:58:41 %2B0200. <19980515005841.C18577@fasterix.frmug.fr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>For the kernel (/sys/netinet), this does make much of a difference >in implementation modularity. My feeling is that, ideally, tcp_*.c >and udp_*.c source files should be shared, but it's easier said >than done. If they are not shared, this duplicates any maintenance >work we have to do on these protocols. >The latest INRIA IPv6 for NetBSD mentions that they now share the >TCP source files. I don't know to what extent or exactly how this >is achieved, but I like that. Hello, a small question... I'm now looking into INRIA for FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE (4/29/98 I think) but I see both sys/netinet/tcp_input.c and sys/netinet/tcp6_input.c, which are almost identical. Am I mistaking something, or obsoleted source is left in the tree? (Or the merge is just for "INRIA for NetBSD" at this moment?) WIDE stack is also thinking about tcp4/6 and udp4/6 merge too and about good/bad points of merged one and separate one. Problem for us is that we have to do the merge for FreeBSD, NetBSD and BSDI separately (since they modified tcp/udp code separately...) itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1089.895201195>