Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:49:16 +1000 From: Dave+Seddon <dave-sender-1932b5@seddon.ca> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Aggregate network interfaces Message-ID: <1125031757.79719.TMDA@seddon.ca> In-Reply-To: <20050826041314.D82A7228737@rusunix.org> References: <20050826041314.D82A7228737@rusunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greetings, Oh wow! That's cool. I missed that somehow. The 'man' page doesn't mention the hash functions options. On the Cat 6500s you can log into the Sup and change the hash function so it's not just IP, but rather IP+Port. I've previously used this to balance the load across multiple gig links with traffic going to a sinlge backup host, for example. (I you want to know how I'll have to look that up) Regards, Dave Seddon Evgueni V. Gavrilov writes: > In article <1125023574.72285.TMDA@seddon.ca> you wrote: > >> IP addresses. It would be cool to have something like Etherchannel, but >> that doesn't work. Solaris has Etherchannel. > you missed ng_fec(4) which runs fine for me with Catalyst 3750 stack (Cisco WS-C3750G-24TS) (gigabit ethernet) > > -- > http://aquatique.rusunix.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1125031757.79719.TMDA>