Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:20:47 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> Cc: FreeBSD AMD list <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Sharing /usr/ports between AMD64 and I386 ok? Message-ID: <1135714847.83838.34.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <cone.1135713305.795857.75924.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> References: <cone.1135713305.795857.75924.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-0ORSRXafy2b5P7knZbAh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Francisco Reyes p=ED=B9e v =FAt 27. 12. 2005 v 14:55 -0500:
> Is /usr/ports the same for AM64 and I386?
The FreeBSD Ports Collection is one and the same across all the releases
and architectures.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Bento's Law: If It Can Break, It Will Break
Bento's Corollary: If It Can Break, Kris Can Send Mail About It
--=-0ORSRXafy2b5P7knZbAh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDsaIfntdYP8FOsoIRAhF+AKCva/VnKYFpQSJvzC80M3tFTWwMgQCdGPMd
854ndmHBj2clxz8TZzNS4XQ=
=XP5T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-0ORSRXafy2b5P7knZbAh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1135714847.83838.34.camel>