Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:09:26 -0700
From:      Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: py-gnome-extras depends on libgda2
Message-ID:  <1152742166.7809.1.camel@triton.mcneil.com>
In-Reply-To: <44B57148.3040403@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <1152740830.57670.4.camel@triton.mcneil.com> <44B57148.3040403@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 18:01 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Sean McNeil wrote:
> > This conflicts with
> > 
> > 	databases/libgnomedb
> > 
> > which is used by gnumeric and gnome2-office.
> > 
> > Changing to libgda3 worked to build py-gnome-extras just fine.
> > 
> > databases/ruby-libgda and deskutils/planner appear to still use libgda2
> > as well.
> 
> The state of libgda3 is unknown.  Development is sporadic, and it is
> still not stable.  gnumeric and gnome2-office can be built without
> libgda3/libgnomedb support.  While changing the py-gnome-extras
> dependency to libgda3 would not affect the build per se, the plist will
> be wrong.

Does libgnomedb really depend on libgda3, or can it be changed to use
libgda2?  Seems like this should be consistent.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1152742166.7809.1.camel>