Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:53:09 +0900 From: Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> To: Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] proper editor Message-ID: <1192535589.861.72.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> In-Reply-To: <47145065.5080807@otenet.gr> References: <1192512563.861.18.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> <47145065.5080807@otenet.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 08:47 +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > > Hi there, I'm beginner. > > > > Please recommend for proper editor so that ... > > I want to practice *Python* under best environment ... > > > > vim, emacs, gedit, or notepad.exe, ... > > > > If you give me good advice about that, I'll study very hard ... > > > > So which one is best editor? ... > > > > > There is no such thing as a "best" editor. Which one you know better NOW? > If the goal is to study Python (assuming no previous experience), go > along with the easiest for you. For starters, if you are using a GUI, > go with Python's own IDLE environment. It is not "advanced", but neither > are you at this point. And it does have some advantages (like immediate > execution of commands to try out things). > Spending time learning a complex editor like vi or emacs, will certainly > pay up in the long run though. Nope. I don't care what it costs. I don't care even if I have to learn a complex editor for long time ... To tell truth, I really want to learn Python with a complex editor like Emacs. I feel so sorry for I object to your professional opinion;; -- Byung-Hee HWANG <bh@izb.knu.ac.kr> "Are you willing to take my advice this time?" -- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 37
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1192535589.861.72.camel>