Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:57:14 +0300 From: "Andrey O.Sokolov" <arctic@alkar.net> To: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass9573@gmx.com> Cc: Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: Network card Intel and 802.1P tag Message-ID: <1249495034.3092.58.camel@Father> In-Reply-To: <4A79C44D.8040803@gmx.com> References: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793F2F9@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <1249493435.3092.45.camel@Father> <4A79C44D.8040803@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
õ óÒ, 2009-08-05 Õ 20:41 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis ÐÉÛÅ: > >> Is the vlan hardware processing enabled? > > > > How I can enable this processing? > > > > "ifconfig em0 vlanhwtag" enables vlan processing in hw > "ifconfig em0 -vlanhwtag" disables vlan processing in hw > Maybe one these will work correctly without the zeroing effect. I tried both variant on both NIC - fxp and em The result doesn't change ;( > Perhaps off topic, but why are you interested in priority > tags, since FreeBSD will silently ignore them? I developing QoS-model for big network. I have casualy found out this problem, when I analyzed the traffic with different COS-value from various devices. -- ***AOS224-RIPE*** mailto:arctic@alkar.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1249495034.3092.58.camel>