Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 13:20:06 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Strange behavior of .zfs/snapshot/* directories in respect to ".." path. Message-ID: <1279842496.20170529132006@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <8138588b-4b03-16d9-77b6-2a3e3444997d@FreeBSD.org> References: <1acc5917-f10f-b18a-50e0-84661173e85d@FreeBSD.org> <e7f30e57-a065-dd10-e79a-9a4b770598b6@FreeBSD.org> <1601598008.20170529015948@serebryakov.spb.ru> <8138588b-4b03-16d9-77b6-2a3e3444997d@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hello Andriy, Monday, May 29, 2017, 9:09:58 AM, you wrote: >> (2) When I've reverted to r318576, this patch helps! > You probably meant r318716 again here? Nope. r318576. I've found "snapshot .." bug at r318576 (see my first message), so when "latest" (I'm using local mirror, so it could be not-really-latest-one) revision — r319076 — crashed, I've reverted to exactly this "proven" revision — r318576. Patch for "snapshot .." was tested at r318576, and crash with and without patch for "snapshot" was at r319076. > If yes, then it's probably exactly the same issue as we had in head: r308826. > Could you please test if that change helps? > I'll take care of this. Now, as r319091 was committed, I'm building new fresh kernel. -- Best regards, Lev mailto:lev@FreeBSD.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1279842496.20170529132006>