Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:24:35 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> To: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: simple patch for portsnap to use wget Message-ID: <1354040675.3923.3.camel@mjakubik.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <CAKoxK%2B5iy2R7=cZp38xKZpTbgFd0aZ3H28tVmPnuPR01w=pO4A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKoxK%2B5iy2R7=cZp38xKZpTbgFd0aZ3H28tVmPnuPR01w=pO4A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:52 +0100, Luca Ferrari wrote: > Now the question is: should this patch, or better the idea of using > wget or another alike substitute to phttpget, be integrated into the > system? > I've tested it on FreeBSD-9-STABLE. Certainly not with a dependency on wget, which is not part of the base system. Use fetch instead. Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1354040675.3923.3.camel>