Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:40:59 +0200 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: So, which IEEE<->Frequency mappings should we be all using? Message-ID: <1374504059.14517.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=yvHUgv6pwK42n%2BNhPrAu9shxc5pigRkhZE%2Bx91W_FoA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20130717_194238_629152_551DCEC6) References: <CAJ-Vmo=yvHUgv6pwK42n%2BNhPrAu9shxc5pigRkhZE%2Bx91W_FoA@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20130717_194238_629152_551DCEC6)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 10:42 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > * 420MHz > * 700MHz > * 900MHz (which we already have, due to history); > * 3.6GHz > * 4.9GHz 3.6 should have been defined in the spec recently, 4.9 surely is defined already (though the whole stack will have to support the dot11ChannelStartingFactor) The others are kinda non-standard extensions, and you probably won't even be able to properly support them since they're kinda pretend-handled like 2.4 GHz. johannes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1374504059.14517.12.camel>