Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 08:41:13 -0700 From: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Lucas_Nali_de_Magalh=c3=a3es?= <rollingbits@gmail.com>, Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>, Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Plans for git Message-ID: <13a965d9-ef02-f876-dd6c-aa872b66d114@nomadlogic.org> In-Reply-To: <202009201400.08KE0PBd028190@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <202009201400.08KE0PBd028190@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> making quarterly reports about this for almost a years as well. We put out >> calls for people to help with the efforts about the same time. We have >> tried at every step of the way to be open and honest that this was going to >> happen. > All developer centric communications.... I would argue that quarterly reports are actually one of the few methods of getting accurate information about the state of the project as a non-insider. i've been following the progress of this work via the quarterly status reports for years now, and as someone who is merely a freebsd operator felt like i was more or less kept up to date on this eventuality. honestly there has to be *some* responsibility of operators to at least make an effort to keep up to date on the status of the various efforts in such a large project. and as an outsider the idea that comms can only happen on the mailing list isn't the greatest - how am i to know that the idea of one person on the ML carries more weight than another, or one persons opinion is the "official" stated opinion of the core group? -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13a965d9-ef02-f876-dd6c-aa872b66d114>