Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 08:48:15 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me> To: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gcc vs gcc48 Message-ID: <1402328895.76875.11.camel@bruno> In-Reply-To: <5395D387.8020902@FreeBSD.org> References: <1402327321.76875.8.camel@bruno> <5395D387.8020902@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:32 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > Sean Bruno ha scritto: > > Ended up in a weird position today running a build. My poudriere > > instance ended up building gcc and gcc48 at the same time. > > > > I thought this was odd. Shouldn't gcc48 supplant gcc for requirements? > > Every port is built independently from the others, so gcc48 is not found > when building other ports that doesn't strictly require it. > Understood. lang/gcc isn't successfully building at the moment. So, when I restart this build, gcc48 will be detected as built so it will be pulled in. Which will in turn start building the ports that were failed on the previous run. This seems like a broken "feature" of ports IMO. I.e. non-consistent runs. sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1402328895.76875.11.camel>