Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:23:23 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multipath TCP for FreeBSD v0.4 Message-ID: <1410909803.3848965.168337885.0D680310@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <CAKYr3zz50CEnX44ErmaN38=T0fBDQhGPVEEG9O8hyHzpT_R6Jg@mail.gmail.com> References: <513CB9AF.3090409@swin.edu.au> <53BF8945.3000802@swin.edu.au> <540D0741.6030403@swin.edu.au> <1410907731.1166.13.camel@bruno> <CAKYr3zz50CEnX44ErmaN38=T0fBDQhGPVEEG9O8hyHzpT_R6Jg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 17:59, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > Im quite curious why you would want to include something thats been found > to be broken and not functional > into mainline.... if it was working sure... im sure we would love it. > However its been months rolling along to get > this patch set out after reporting previous bugs that... well... still > remain. Id suggest to clear up and push > a functional working implementation, might gather more participants. > > This kind of response isn't exactly productive. We need to encourage those who are working on new features and find a way to easily provide them with a wide audience of testers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1410909803.3848965.168337885.0D680310>