Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 11:18:15 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= BLOT <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High Kernel Load with nfsv4 Message-ID: <1419070695.4549.6.camel@unix-experience.fr> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412192005130.6852@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <766911003.8048587.1418095910736.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <1e19554bc0d4eb3e8dab74e2056b5ec4@mail.unix-experience.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412192005130.6852@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Dmitry, you mean less process improve performance ? -- Best regards, Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network engineer http://www.unix-experience.fr Le vendredi 19 décembre 2014 à 20:06 +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky a écrit : > Loic, > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Lo?c Blot wrote: > > > Hi Rick, > > I'm trying NFSv3. > > Some jails are starting very well but now i have an issue with lockd after some minutes: > > > > nfs server 10.10.X.8:/jails: lockd not responding > > nfs server 10.10.X.8:/jails lockd is alive again > > > > I look at mbuf, but i seems there is no problem. > > > > Here is my rc.conf on server: > > > > nfs_server_enable="YES" > > nfsv4_server_enable="YES" > > nfsuserd_enable="YES" > > nfsd_server_flags="-u -t -n 256" > > just a random thought: are you sure you want so much nfsd threads? I suppose > lock contention could be easily involved here... > > [snip] > > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1419070695.4549.6.camel>