Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:32:06 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: booting UFS2 on alpha (was: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/common ufsread.c) Message-ID: <14845.1034332326@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:01:24 %2B0200." <20021010210124.GV17920@cicely8.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20021010210124.GV17920@cicely8.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter writes: >>>>boot dka400 >(boot dka400.4.0.6.0 -flags 0) >block 0 of dka400.4.0.6.0 is not a valid boot block >bootstrap failure > >This one is my biggest problem. >SRM doesn't accept the disklabel. >Once I dd the first 512 bytes from an old disk SRM is happy. >I compared them with hexdump, but wasn't able to find the reason. Is there some place which documents what the requirements for being a valid boot-block is ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14845.1034332326>