Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 17:12:08 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ache@nagual.pp.ru, ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tk80 port or tcl installation are broken on -current Message-ID: <14994.884221928@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jan 1998 16:57:55 PST." <199801080057.QAA16952@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> * Why? It seems that things were fine until you rocked the boat with > * a bsd.port.mk that tried to be too clever at detecting this. :) > > Um, did you read the message? That has nothing to do with my change, > Jordan. I know, but the topic only seems to have flared up again on account of it. :) Yes, I see the problem. No, I see no immediate solution that doesn't have drawbacks of its own. Yes, I hate this entire problem and would just as soon say "heck, just nuke TCL out of the base OS" if I had a way of handling dist/ports dependencies currently in the tree. The fact that I don't is why so many people are complaining that the Handbook and FAQ have been left out of the doc dist since 2.2.2. Jordanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14994.884221928>