Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:15:39 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <karsten@rohrbach.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building apache from /usr/ports Message-ID: <15133.37451.23934.758674@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <20010606034917.D97958@mail.webmonster.de> References: <JBEOKPCEMKJLMJAKBECCMELDDAAA.jwatkins@firstplan.com> <20010605140629.B15206@leviathan.inethouston.net> <20010605152718.A21889@localhost> <20010606034917.D97958@mail.webmonster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Karsten W. Rohrbach <karsten@rohrbach.de> types: > you won't recognize it until you have to implement a heavily loaded > server with php or perl in-core. position independent code is know to be > slower, but it outperforms monolithic compiles by saving a lot of ram. Ok, where does the savings come from? You get one copy of the code, shared by all the processes running the binary, whether or not the code is in a shared library. COW for data should mean that data should be shared pretty much the same. So what have I missed? Thanx, <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15133.37451.23934.758674>