Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:47:38 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Toshihiko ARAI <toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] pccard_ether and removable_* variables Message-ID: <15256.60442.758729.299336@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <200109071244.f87Cib011728.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <15245.13394.275183.61715@nomad.yogotech.com> <200109011153.f81BrZL93078.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> <15253.10889.977127.513674@nomad.yogotech.com> <200109051230.f85CUGQ39840.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> <15254.22900.863293.94059@nomad.yogotech.com> <200109071244.f87Cib011728.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> You may be just right. However, 'static_routes_<interface>' is null > >> and void with DHCP. Implementation of dhclient seems to surely deal > >> with 'dhclient-script', but I don't so know a lot about DHCP. > > > True, but with DHCP, the routes are flushed automatically via the DHCP > > scripts. Someone who is using DHCP to get their addresses is certainly > > not going to be running as a router. > > I examined it. As a result, I understood that removable_route_flush > was unnecessary now. When there was not dhclient with FreeBSD > standard, it was necessary. > > I updated a patch below. Please review and test. > > http://home.jp.FreeBSD.org/~toshi/pccard-current-20010907.diff Very close. This is essentially the same patch as exists in -stable. Unfortunately, with this patch, no 'static' routes are ever flushed. It would be nice to be able to flush the routes add via static_route_interface. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15256.60442.758729.299336>