Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:04:08 -0700 (MST) From: klaus4 <maciphone2@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JDK 11 now ported to i_386 Message-ID: <1552943048231-0.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20190318050841.GA68388@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <B82939DB-9B0F-488A-A145-B2F62A550D35@googlemail.com> <20190318050841.GA68388@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Greg, PR was merged, thank you ! . The "bootstrap"-jdk_i386 contains the jdk-demo-files, you can shorten it a little=20 for the bootstrap-jdk in the ports -tree. It should be able to compile directly through your openjdk11-Makefile(after updating to i386 of course), I`ll make some further tests. =E2=80=94 I compiled the bootstrap jdks for the i386-port all directly from scratch under freebsd, not via NFS.=20 So from 9 to 10, from 10 to 11, so they`re all natively available. Related to this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222568= : You are absolutely right that e.g. jdk9 would be unnecessary for users. For developers (in my experience) the opposite is the case.(research, debugging= , bootstrapping=E2=80=A6) : So my idea would be eventually to provide ALL openjdks (9,10,11..) in the ports-tree. I could help with it. thanks for all your effort to freebsd-jdk Best regards=20 Klaus -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-java-f4188125.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1552943048231-0.post>