Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:59:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" <iaccounts@ibctech.ca> To: "Freddie Cash" <fjwcash+freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-BETA1.5 ISO/ftp Message-ID: <1745.208.70.104.211.1193356745.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> In-Reply-To: <200710251631.37160.fjwcash%2Bfreebsd@gmail.com> References: <200710252120.l9PLKYFJ041330@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> <200710251516.19505.fjwcash%2Bfreebsd@gmail.com> <1985.208.70.104.211.1193354645.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> <200710251631.37160.fjwcash%2Bfreebsd@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Will csup work the exact same way, without having to do the pkg_add >> steps? Is this what " a drop in replacement" means? > > Yes. LOL. Straight to the point. I like that. If I may try to expand your reply for the archives (and myself), I must assume that csup implies fastest_cvsup correct? Does csup at this point use my existing supfile(s) and just change the server on the fly? Another yes/no will give me enough info to investigate. Usually though, in a case like this, status-quo is faster for me :) Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1745.208.70.104.211.1193356745.squirrel>