Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:50 +0300
From:      Achilleas Mantzios <achill@smadev.internal.net>
To:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Re: java diablo-jdk
Message-ID:  <1827608.yJKzdi0Quu@smadev.internal.net>
In-Reply-To: <5074C1D7.3040209@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20121009231547.1f4cfa57@davenulle.org> <5074C1D7.3040209@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On =C3=8E=C2=A4=C3=8F=C2=81=C3=8E=C2=B9 09 =C3=8E=C2=9F=C3=8E=C2=BA=C3=8F=
=C2=84 2012 20:31:19 Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> On 2012-10-09 17:15:47 -0400, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> > Hello,
> >=20
> > I do not see the point to keep diablo-jdk as a build dependency of=20=

> > java. Is there something that prevent us to distribute a package
> > of openjdk, just to be able to built a native version of openjdk
> > or sunjdk ?
>=20
> No.  The only problem is we have to provide entire sources + our
> patches along with the tarball *somewhere*, just to comply with GPL.
>=20
> > I'm tired of the "fetch the diablo-jdk from FreeBSD and agree with=20=

> > the license". And even more since I use poudriere to build=20
> > packages.
> >=20
> > The FreeBSD java support is not bad (I'm happy with it, I can do=20=

> > all my Java developpement on FreeBSD using netbeans and openjdk)=20=

> > but this dependency on diablo really sucks. We don't need this=20
> > IMO.
>=20
> There are actually two possibilities, i.e., a) build openjdk from
> completely open-sourced and bootstrap-less environment or b)
> distribute special binary openjdk tarballs only for bootstrapping.  b=
)
> is pretty straight forward (albeit the source distribution problem)
> and I am working on it as an interim solution.  A preliminary port is=

> here:
>=20
> https://redports.org/browser/jkim/java/bootstrap-openjdk
>=20
> However, I believe a) is the ultimate solution, e.g., ECJ/GCJ + GNU
> classpath + CacaoVM/JamVM/Avian, etc.  (VMKit/LLVM is in my wildest
> dreams...)

Do ECJ or GCJ produce same quality class bytecode as javac?

>=20
> Jung-uk Kim
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>=20
> iEYEARECAAYFAlB0wdcACgkQmlay1b9qnVM+bACgsja1GLV7UkPhY93Sp3lxK8UD
> FF0AoNMlMzQjK4h0vweJCWolEWUhSRbF
> =3D4IEx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.or=
g"
-
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEPT



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1827608.yJKzdi0Quu>