Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:25:06 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sbufs in userland Message-ID: <18974.983175906@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:33:19 MST." <20010226003319.A19994@panzer.kdm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010226003319.A19994@panzer.kdm.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: >1. Should we put sbufs in userland? Yes. >2. If we do put sbufs in userland, what is the best way to do it? > There are three different ways I can think of: I think that libsbuf makes sense. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18974.983175906>