Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:51:57 +0000 (UTC) From: Jin Guojun <jguojun@sbcglobal.net> To: Questions Freebsd <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: X Window is sluggish in 10.2-R (nv server for GeForce 210) Message-ID: <1972431430.5431515.1439704317249.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1614462542.1974994.1439701288919.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1614462542.1974994.1439701288919.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It looks like not just X server is slow, other servers slow too and take a lot of CPU.Those services take less than 10% total CPU when running 8.4 / 10.1.
Is something under 10.2-R needs to be tuned for performance?
-Jin
last pid: 1088; load averages: 1.93, 1.07, 0.53 up 0+00:05:16 22:49:12
58 processes: 3 running, 55 sleeping
CPU: 19.9% user, 0.0% nice, 61.0% system, 0.3% interrupt, 18.8% idle
Mem: 402M Active, 513M Inact, 528M Wired, 192K Cache, 821M Buf, 6440M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
951 jin 75 20 0 711M 365M uwait 3 1:17 115.23% firefox
1083 jin 1 89 0 36688K 5988K CPU0 0 0:47 55.37% imapd
1081 jin 1 88 0 36688K 5988K CPU2 2 0:47 52.59% imapd
1077 jin 44 21 0 555M 271M uwait 1 0:19 21.14% thunderbi
923 jin 5 20 0 460M 363M uwait 0 0:09 2.20% Xorg
777 root 1 20 0 16728K 2236K select 2 0:00 0.00% moused
last pid: 1090; load averages: 3.67, 2.11, 1.04 up 0+00:07:51 22:51:47
58 processes: 3 running, 55 sleeping
CPU: 19.9% user, 0.0% nice, 63.8% system, 0.6% interrupt, 15.7% idle
Mem: 604M Active, 592M Inact, 576M Wired, 192K Cache, 820M Buf, 6110M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
951 jin 73 20 0 708M 364M uwait 2 4:22 112.79% firefox
1083 jin 1 101 0 36688K 5988K CPU2 2 2:46 94.78% imapd
1081 jin 1 101 0 36688K 5988K CPU0 0 2:46 94.48% imapd
1077 jin 41 24 0 767M 481M uwait 3 1:02 34.62% thunderbi
923 jin 5 20 0 452M 355M uwait 1 0:12 2.10% Xorg
On Saturday, August 15, 2015 10:01 PM, Jin Guojun <jguojun@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
A machine with AMD A8-6600K with Radeon + Nvidia GeForce 210 graphic card.It works with FreeBSD 8.4-R .. 10.1-R well; however, after upgraded to 10.2-R,
X Window seems having problem in doing configuration and running server.
In X -configure, the xorg.conf.new generated correctly, but have error at the end says "number of screen s does not match number of devices. It found two screens and two devices (see log below), so not sure what is the problem.
When startx, moving window around and scrolling window (using sliding bar) are very sluggish.When exist X window, server generate a non-error error:
[ 2700.740] (EE) Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file.
Does this mean that a Xorg 7.7_2 has some defect?
Does anyone encounter the similar issue in 10.2-Release?
-Jin
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 16 13:14:22 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77CB9B9CBA
for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:14:22 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugReporter@ib-haakh.de)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de
[IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::11])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CDF01D21
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:14:21 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from bugReporter@ib-haakh.de)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t39730852; l13;
s=domk; d=ib-haakh.de;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:
Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date;
bh=OWRzIsb8a3tHUcBHVN266JheUJM4seK2jMVaUX+RdvY=;
b=oBgpZASknE5aB4TzFKFKaKFyj8KwlrDVspgHdDFejlhbS++UjAK56T5iszI/Iibnvri
XMAEOHdV5gsGEF/39lNxeDrIl5ZUcQ15C7nCebRw0/i26kuCaT2WrfmbZRDVQUwq0p0EX
DTnzWFugvoPVHsxPCcmPOvDPuRezmt7a3EYX-RZG-AUTH: :LWQcbViwW/e6OTbW0dHzwKkCepEs/ThuRG8zpeuciRNkwehqPJJjNur9OZW5
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from abaton.Haakh.de (p57A70E62.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.167.14.98])
by post.strato.de (RZmta 37.9 DYNA|AUTH)
with ESMTPA id Z00a76r7GDEBJCh;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:14:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Crabberio.Haakh.de (crabberio.Haakh.de [192.168.63.16])
by abaton.Haakh.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t7GDEBQc093552;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:14:11 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from bugReporter@ib-haakh.de)
Message-ID: <55D08CA3.7050306@ib-haakh.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 15:14:11 +0200
From: "Dr. Andreas Haakh" <bugReporter@ib-haakh.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Smith <paul.j.smith0@gmail.com>
CC: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: a bug in /bin/ls
References: <55CD23C7.9010803@ib-haakh.de>
<CACoaAtPak43P9N+hcjXWAm2rdFAA5Z8NXAnaxxTcvy5Lxod4fQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACoaAtPak43P9N+hcjXWAm2rdFAA5Z8NXAnaxxTcvy5Lxod4fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:14:23 -0000
Am 14.08.2015 um 05:26 schrieb Paul Smith:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Dr. Andreas Haakh
> <bugReporter@ib-haakh.de> wrote:
>> On:
>> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #0
>> r286580: Mon Aug 10 19:49:05 CEST 2015
>> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64
>>
>> using the "-U"-flag in /bin/ls together with "-l"
>> leads to the following output
>> [...]
>> -rwxr--r-- 1 krabbe ibh 798720 1 Jan 1970 IMAG1562.jpg
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 krabbe ibh 579493 1 Jan 1970 IMAG1714.jpg
>> [...]
>>
>> and the sorting is not affected by the flag (still by name).
>>
>>
>
> >From the man page:
>
> -U Use time when file was created for sorting or printing.
>
> -u Use time of last access, instead of time of last modification
> of the file for sorting (-t) or printing (-l).
>
> -t Sort by descending time modified (most recently modified first). . . .
>
> Does something like ls -Ult give you what you want? My interpretation
> is that -u and -U need to be combined with -t or -l.
>
> I think the -c option works the same way.
> Did you get different output on a previous FreeBSD version?
>
> Paul
-Ult returns Jan 1st 1970 as well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1972431430.5431515.1439704317249.JavaMail.yahoo>