Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 00:19:40 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: phk@ref.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: nate@sneezy.sri.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org, core@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NMI Error success story Message-ID: <199503190819.AAA22929@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199503190806.AAA22675@ref.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Mar 19, 95 00:06:58 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Humm.. 3+1+1+1 = 6, 3+2+2+2=9, should have been 30% faster if everything > > hit the cache, figure an actual cache hit rate of 80% and you should have > > seen a 24% performance increase by this. > > Well, 10% is what I saw on "make world"... We must be missing the cache a lot more than I figured on. Time for me to go stick some Pentium counter code in, wish that I had some way to easily watch the external cache hit rate... let me see, I need 2 >60Mhz counters, and the data books on the SIS 82C50X or Opti 597 chip sets. Wonder how many digits I need for make world :-) :-) -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503190819.AAA22929>