Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1995 22:51:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: nate@trout.sri.MT.net, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What I'd *really like* for 2.0.5 Message-ID: <199504290551.WAA24121@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199504290547.XAA06260@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 28, 95 11:47:16 pm
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> What I meant was that userconfig assumes the user has knowlege on how it
> works, so for normal people they don't have 'access' to it. Access was
> probably a poor choice of word to use. *IF* we are going to use it for
> all of the kernel device debugging, then it should be better documented
> before we remove the only useful form we have now.
printf("Use \"boot /kernel -c\" to see what you don't see."); ? :-)
Lousy argument in my book...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent'
=> 'no rude people are relevant'
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504290551.WAA24121>