Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 05:54:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R? Message-ID: <199506130354.FAA06318@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199506122107.OAA02998@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 12, 95 02:07:45 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > It was just before you closed CTM for the tagging/merge after the release. > > I'd say what all CTMers have is either -current (stopped around June, 1st) or > > 2.0.5R if src-cur was made from the RELENG_2_0_5 branch and not from > > -current (which I doubt). > > DO I HAVE TO YELL THIS, /usr/src on freefall WAS on the RELENG_2_0_5 > branch 2 days after I branched the thing!!!! You do not have to yell this, Rod. Calm down, and remember that not everybody on this list is within a 10-minute-SMTP turnaround access. Ollivier did only incidentally have the same thoughts as me. (Btw., it has not been publically announced that freefall's /usr/src has been up to RELENG_2_0_5, or I must have missed it when digging through my mail pile after the vacation. I'm pretty damned sure that there hasn't been any announcement in ctm-announce, which is the CTM announcement list for all CTM'ers, I think.) And I _never_ offered public CVS access for anybody. I've only been referring to the fact that _I_ have the CVS available -- but that's certainly no news for the most on this list (and I don't see any reason why I would not allow to mention *this*). Just to set this straight... -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506130354.FAA06318>