Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Jan 1996 11:33:12 -0500
From:      dennis@etinc.com (dennis)
To:        Andreas Klemm <andreas@knobel.gun.de>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Multi-Port Async Cards
Message-ID:  <199601291633.LAA11966@etinc.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Sat, 27 Jan 1996, dennis wrote:
>> This scenario is frightening to me....although I think that you've
answered my 
>> question......Its the final straw I think in making FreeBSD
>> marketable...obviously
>> the AST solution is unacceptable for a real ISP....I wonder why the cyclades
>> board
>> needs mgetty.....whats the major diff between getty and mgetty?
>
>Dennis, a real ISP buys a fine Terminal Server to handle several
>Modem lines. Something like a Livingston Portmaster isn't too
>expensive for a real ISP. 
>
>Many Modem lines produce many Interrupts. Outsource this job to
>another piece of hardware as an Terminal server. Let FreeBSD be 
>a good server machine for www an such.

a good multiport card offloads the interrupts and produces block streams
of data. Thats why I asked the question.

A "real" isp might use a portmaster....but many non-isps would like to 
provide a small number of modem lines for corporate dial-in. Its a big
selling point for the O/S.

Dennis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emerging Technologies, Inc.      http://www.etinc.com

Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For
Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame
Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD 
and LINUX




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601291633.LAA11966>