Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 12:15:56 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: mrcpu@cdsnet.net (Jaye Mathisen) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current MMAP vs INN 1.4unoff3 Message-ID: <199603061915.MAA11561@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960305143242.22216I-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net> from "Jaye Mathisen" at Mar 5, 96 02:34:58 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's still broken, exhibits the same behaviour as a 2.1-release box, > where it has problems with the active file. > > It would be nice if this would eventually get fixed, even if just for > correctness sake, as opposed to any measurable performance increase. Could you provide a stand-alone regression test set of behaviour with documented expected behaviour and exception lists? It would be nice if we could set up a TET or ETET framework for regression/validation and automate this process. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603061915.MAA11561>